VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Raghupathi v. The Commissioner

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 June 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 8632/2021

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER Aggrieved by the impugned order of demand notice dated 10.12.2019 passed by the first respondent herein / Commissioner, Cuddalore Municipality in respect of Shop No 10, Beach Road, Cuddalore, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and also perused the materials available on record.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner herein is the tenant of the Shop No 10, Beach Road, Cuddalore owned by the Cuddalore Municipality and he has been issued with the demand notice on

10.12.2019. He further submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to submit his reply to the demand notice and after considering the same, the authorities may pass appropriate orders in the subject issue and thus, prayed for appropriate orders.

¶4Per contra, the learned Standing counsel for the first respondent submitted that the lease period of the subject shop was expired in the year 2025 itself and the petitioner did not sought for any extension time for the lease. However, he submitted that if the first respondent receive any reply to the Page3 of 5 demand notice from the petitioner, the same will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed by the first respondent in accordance with law, within a reasonable time.

¶5On considering the facts of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the issuance of demand notice by the first respondent to the petitioner herein cannot be entertained at threshold, as the same requires adjudication. However, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court permits the petitioner to render his reply to the demand notice dated

10.12.2019, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of any such reply from the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to adjudicate the subject issue and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks therefrom.

¶6With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed, if any. There shall be no order as to costs. 03-06-2026 Index: Yes/No DP Page4 of 5 To

¶1The Commissioner Cuddalore Municipality, Bharathi Road, Cuddalore-607001 Page5 of 5

M.DHANDAPANI, J. DP 03-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.No.9182 of 2021 R.Raghupathi S/O. Ramamurthy, No 10, Beach Road, Cuddalore- 607001 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner Cuddalore Municipality, Bharathi Road, Cuddalore- 607001 2. Mrs. Gowri Sankar No 150 LIG, Anaikuppam, Cuddalore- 607001 ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records and quash the demand notice in NA.KA.NO 14703/ A2/ 16 dated 10.12.2019 issued by the first respondent in respect of Shop No 10, Beach Road, Cuddalore. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Gururaj For Respondent(s): Mr.B.ANAND for R1 Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.