VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

R.Sathiya v. Balasivaramakrishnan.V

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 April 2025
Bench
P. Velmuruganauthor
Case no.
CRL RC 531/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P. Velmurugan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners have filed this criminal revision petition challenging the order dated 06.09.2024 passed in M.C.No.69 of 2022 by the learned I Additional Principal Family Judge, Chennai.

¶2The respondent/husband had already filed O.P.No.3738 of 2018 for dissolution of marriage between the first petitioner/wife and the respondent/husband. The first petitioner/wife had also filed O.P.No.142 of 2018 for restitution of Conjugal rights before the Subordinate Court, Tirupatthur. The petitioners have also filed the maintenance case under Section 125 Cr.P.C., in M.C.No.69 of 2022, seeking monthly maintenance.

¶3Though the first petitioner had already invoked Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act and when the same was pending before the Court, she has also invoked Section 125 Cr.P.C., before the I Additional Family Court at Chennai and filed M.C.No.69 of 2022 and the said petition was partly allowed by the Family Court vide order dated 06.09.2024.

¶4Considering the economical status of the respondent/wife and income and liability of the respondent/wife , the Family Court ordered Rs.10,000/- per month to the first petitioner and Rs.20,000/- per month to the second petitioner, as monthly maintenance on the file of the I Additional Family Court at Chennai.

¶5Considering the scope and object of Section 125 Cr.P.C., this Court does not find any perversity or illegality or infirmity in the impugned order passed by the learned I Additional Family Judge at Chennai and this is not a fit case for admission.

¶6It is submitted that the first petitioner/wife had already invoked Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Hence, the petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy before the Court in the pending petition filed under the Hindu Marriage Act. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed at the admission stage itself. 15-04-2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To The I Additional Principal Family Judge, Chennai P.VELMURUGAN J. mfa

15-04-2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN 1. R.Sathiya W/o.Balasivaramakrishnan 2. B.S.Reshikasri (Minor) D/o.Balasivaramakrishnan, Rep by mother and natural Guardian the 1st petitioner herein Both residing at No.146/1, Chinna Vengayapalli Village, Karuppanur Post, Thirupattur Taluk and District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Balasivaramakrishnan.V S/o.Veerabadran, No.51/67A, Rangadass Colony, 3rd Street, Villivakkam, Chennai - 600 049. Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 438 of BNSS 2023 read with 442 of BNSS Act, to call for the entire records in M.C.No.69 of 2022 on the file of the I Additional Principal Family Judge, Chennai and to set- aside the part of the order dated 06.09.2024 and to enhance the amount from Rs.10,000/- per month to Rs.20,000/- per month as far as the 1st petitioner is concerned. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Babu

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.