VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Jammu and Kashmir High Court 2025 › High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh

Zaffer Ahmad Lone v. Union Territory of J and K and Ors. (Revenue)

Disposed Off
Court
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
Decided
12 August 2025
Bench
Rahul Bharti, Judge
Case no.
WP(C) 1919/2025

Follow Jammu and Kashmir High CourtFollow Rahul BhartiFollow Judge

Judgment

O R D E R

12.08.2025

¶01The petitioner has come forward registering alleged objections with respect to the setting up of Petrol Pump by the respondent No. 11 at the approved site but without bearing all the requisite No Objection Certificates

(NOCs) from all the concerned departments under the regime of law governing setting up and commissioning of a Petrol Pump.

¶02In this regard, the petitioner has enlisted number of documents to show which are required for setting up of Petrol Pump and its subsequent commissioning which by reference to the respondent No. 9 are said to be wanting in one way or the other and, therefore, this petition has come to be filed obviously with an end objective to stall the working of the Petrol Pump otherwise for which the infrastructure has come to be installed by the respondent No. 11 under the agency and aegis of the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC).

¶03A district magistrate of a given district is an authority who, otherwise with or without empowerment at his disposal, can always look into a situation which involves safety and security of the person and property of citizens of India and in that regard even a Petrol Pump as a matter of business is an activity which is meant to be carried on only upon due compliance of all the requisite permissions in place without any compromise in any manner whatsoever.

¶04Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of at its very inception stage with a direction to the District Magistrate, Pulwama to examine all the requisite NOCs of the respondent No. 11 and if found complete valid and effective for enabling him to commence and carry on with the business of Retail Petrol Pump then to allow the same by passing an order bearing reasons and if not then also to pass an order bearing reasons.

¶05Petitioner shall also be entitled to place his objections with respect to the NOCs as has come to be procured and presented by the respondent No. 11 to show that all the requisite NOCs are not at the disposal of respondent No. 11 with respect to the Petrol Pump.

¶06Needful to be done within a period of one month.

¶07One month period to commence from the date a copy of this order gets delivered by the respondent No. 11 to the District Magistrate, Pulwama.

¶08This writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶09Any outcome borne out of the indulgence of District Magistrate, Pulwama, be it against or in favour of either of the party shall entitle them to approach the appropriate legal authority/forum for appropriate legal course of action.

(RAHUL BHARTI)

JUDGE SRINAGAR

12.08.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

Sr. No. 43 Suppl. List IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C)No. 1919/2025 Zaffer Ahmad Lone …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Salih Pirzada, Adv. Vs UT of JK and Ors. …Respondent(s) Through: Ms Yasmeen Jan, Adv, vice Mr. T.M.Shamsi, DSGI . Mr. Shabir Ahmad, Advocate Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Wani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.