- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 7 June 2023
- Bench
- Kalyan Rai Surana
- Case no.
- WP(C) 2953/2023
Follow Gauhati High CourtFollow Kalyan Rai Surana
Judgment
ORDER Date : 07-06-2023 Heard Mr. Y.S. Mannan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Page No.# 2/4 M. Chetia, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondent no.2.
¶2In view of the nature of grievance raised in this present writ petition, issuance of notice on the respondent no.1 is dispensed with. Moreso, because of the reason that although the petitioner herein took steps on several occasions before the learned trial Court, the appearance of the respondent no.1 could not be secured.
¶3This writ petition was initially filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, pursuant to order dated 31.05.2023, the learned counsel for the petitioner had amended this writ petition, and this writ petition is now taken up under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction that the learned trial Court would ensure speedy trial of the proceedings of Sessions Special (Companies Act) case no.5/2018 pending before the Court of Addl. Session Judge no.1, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati.
¶4The case of the petitioner in brief is that the respondent no.1 is holding-over a company quarter, and as the service of the respondent no.1 was terminated, a notice was issued to the respondent no.1 to vacate the company quarter and to hand over vacant possession back to the petitioner. As the respondent no.1 did not comply with the notice issued on 13.01.2016, the petitioner had instituted a complaint case before the Court of learned CJM, Dibrugarh which was initially registered as case no.1(c)/2016 initially under section 630(B) of the Companies Act, 1956 which was later on converted to a complaint under section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013. Page No.# 3/4
¶5The complaint under section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013 is triable before the Special Court constituted under section 435 of the Companies Act, 2013 and as per notification dated 05.02.2018 published in the Gazette of India under S.O. 528(E), the Court of Addl. District and Sessions Judge, No.1, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati was designated at the Special Court to try offences under section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013.
¶6The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Companies Act, 2013 has been amended by way of substitution as per the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 w.e.f. 22.01.2021 under SO 325(E) dated
22.01.2021 and the effect of such amendment is that the offences under section 452 of the Companies Act would now be triable before the jurisdictional Magistrate. The provision of section 60 of the Amendment Act is quoted below:
¶60In section 435 of the principal Act, in sub-section (1), for the words "offences under this Act, by notification", the words and figures "offences under this Act, except under section 452, by notification" shall be substituted.
¶7In view of the amendment to provision of section 435 of the Companies Act, 2013 by which the jurisdiction for trial of the cases under section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013 is vested on the jurisdictional Magistrate, the Court is of the considered opinion that this would be a fit and appropriate case for directing transfer of the proceedings of Sessions Special (Companies Act) case no.5/2018 from the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.1, Kamrup Metro, Guwahati to the Court of learned CJM, Dibrugarh to adjudicate the matter. The said learned Court would have the liberty of Page No.# 4/4 transferring the matter for adjudication before the competent and appropriate Court under its jurisdiction, if desired.
¶8The Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.1, Kamrup Metro, Guwahati shall transmit the records of the said Sessions Special (Companies Act) case no.5/2018 to the Court of learned CJM, Dibrugarh.
¶9The petitioner shall appear before the transferee Court on 23.06.2023 and await further instructions from the said learned Court by producing a certified copy of the order.
¶10The petitioner is at liberty to move the jurisdictional Court for a speedy trial. The petitioner shall also produce a certified copy of this order before the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.1, Kamrup Metro, Guwahati so as to enable the said learned Court to transfer the records to the transferee Court at the earliest.
¶11The application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010109602023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2953/2023 JALAN NAGAR TEA ESTATE PVT. LTD. JALAN NAGAR, DIBRUGARH, P.O. JALAN NAGAR, DIST. DIBRUGARH,ASSAM, PIN- 786005, REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR, JALAN NAGAR TEA ESTATE PVT. LTD. VERSUS LALMONI GOWAALA AND ANR W/O- SRI LADO GOWALA, R/O- P.T. LINE, HOUSE NO. 35, JALAN NAGAR TEA ESTATE, P.O. JALAN NAGAR, DIST, DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN- 786005. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPT. OF LAW AND JUSTICE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI- Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. Y S MANNAN Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.