VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Muksidul Islam v. The State of Assam and Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
10 May 2023
Bench
Ajit Borthakurauthor
Case no.
Crl.Pet. 425/2023

Follow Gauhati High CourtFollow Ajit Borthakur

Judgment

ORDER

10.05.2023

Heard Mr. N. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent No.1. By this petition under Sections 482/401 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the NBWA and P&A issued against him by the learned Special Judge, Page No.# 2/3 Nagaon in Special Case No.22/2015 under Sections 4/17 of the POCSO Act. Mr. N. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that on receipt of summons, the petitioner appeared before the Court of learned Special Judge, Nagaon on 21.06.2017 and he was allowed to remain on previous bail. Thereafter, till

30.01.2019, the petitioner had been regularly appearing before the learned Court below. Mr. Uddin submits that the petitioner being a poor person went to Kerala for earning his livelihood for which on 17.04.2019, he could not appear before the learned Court below and the learned trial Court issued NBWA against him which had been re-issued from time to time. Thereafter, Mr. Uddin submits, on 21.12.2021, P&A was issued against the petitioner. Mr. Uddin submits that non appearance of the petitioner before the learned trial Court was completely unintentional and as he is willing to participate in trial, an opportunity may be given to the him to appear before the learned Court below and till his appearance, the execution of the NBWA and P&A issued against him may be directed to be kept in abeyance. Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that in the backdrop of facts stated above, the petitioner may be directed to appear before the learned Court below on a specified date, subject to conditions. Be it mentioned here that within the ambit and scope of the power vested on this Court, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the NBWA and P&A issued by the learned Court below cannot be recalled. However, having considered the above submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides and consideration of the averments made in the petition supported by the documents annexed thereto, it is provided that the petitioner shall appear before the Court of learned Special Judge, Nagaon within a period of 15(fifteen) days from today and till his appearance, the execution of the NBWA and P&A issued against him shall be kept in abeyance subject to the condition that if he fails to appear before the learned Court below within the specified period of 15(fifteen) days, on and from 16th day this order shall have no force. Page No.# 3/3 With the above direction, the petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010098222023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./425/2023 MUKSIDUL ISLAM S/O LT. HARMUJ ALI VII PENAI BAGAMUKH P.S. SAMUGRUI DIST. NAGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:AJIMUDDIN S/O LT. ESUB ALI VILL. GOROI MARI P.S. ULUONI DIST. NAGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.