Surender Bhardwaj v. The State ( NCT of Delhi)

O R D E R %

27.10.2016

¶1Learned counsel for the petitioner and complainant states that the parties have arrived at a settlement. Exchange of articles has been done and the parties will shortly be filing a petition seeking quashing of the FIR in question.

¶2Considering the fact that the parties have settled the matter, it would be in the interest of justice to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶3It is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in FIR No. 628/2015 under Sections 323/354/392/506/34 IPC registered at PS Palam Village, the petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹15,000/- with one surety of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/SHO concerned, further subject to the condition that he will join the investigation as and when directed by the BAIL APPLN. 2508/2015

Investigating Officer and will not leave the country without prior permission of the learned Trial Court.

¶4Petition is disposed of.

¶5Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J. OCTOBER 27, 2016 'vn'

BAIL APPLN. 2508/2015

1# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2508/2015 SURENDER BHARDWAJ ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Vinay K. Sharma, Advocate. versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. Mr. Udham Singh, Advocate for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA