Bhiku Ram Jain v. Jay Engineering Works Ltd

O R D E R %

03.11.2017

CM No.39526/2017 (for exemption)

¶1Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶2The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1243/2017

¶3This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 13th September, 2017 in TP(C) No.118/2017 of the Court of District & Sessions Judge, District Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi] of dismissal of the petition filed by the petitioner for re-transfer of his suit transferred, the counsel for the petitioner informs to the Court of ADJ-09, District Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, back to the Court of ADJ-13 in the same district.

¶4The counsel for the petitioner on enquiry states that the suit was earlier pending in the Court of ADJ-13 but was transferred to the Court of ADJ-09.

¶5The basis of the re-transfer sought was that the final arguments in the suit were part heard before the learned ADJ to whose Court the suit was sought to be re-transferred. CM(M) 1243/2017

¶6The counsel for the petitioner is however blissfully unaware as to the reason of transfer.

¶7Without knowing the reason for transfer, re-transfer cannot be sought. Dismissed. No costs.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J NOVEMBER 03, 2017 "gsr"..

CM(M) 1243/2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1243/2017 BHIKU RAM JAIN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Adv. Versus JAY ENGINEERING WORKS LTD ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW