- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 2 November 2017
- Bench
- Najmi Waziri
- Case no.
- TR.P.(CRL.) 45/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Najmi Waziri
Judgment
O R D E R %
02.11.2017 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that since the filing of the petition, by an administrative order the Roster has been changed and the case has been assigned to another Court. The petition has become virtually infructuous. In the circumstances, the learned Counsel seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue remedy of his grievances, if any, as may be available in law. Liberty granted. The petition alongwith pending application is dismissed as withdrawn.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J. NOVEMBER 02, 2017 sb
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR.P.(CRL.) 45/2017 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 17843-44/2017 SURAJ ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivam Chowdhary, Advocate. Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Sangeeta, P.S. Mangol Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.