VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Dinesh & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
3 November 2017
Bench
A.K. Pathakauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 4468/2017

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak

Judgment

O R D E R %

03.11.2017 It is submitted that petitioners and respondent no.2 are neighbours. A quarrel took place between them on some trivial issue which led to registration of FIR No. 844/2015 under Sections 354/323/506/341/34 IPC at police station Samaipur Badli, on the complaint of respondent no2. Now, petitioners and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes amicably before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 4th August, 2017 vide Annexure-C, therefore, aforesaid FIR may be quashed. Respondent no.2 is present in Court and has been identified by SI Dharmender Pratap Singh of police station Samaipur Badli. She submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioners of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. She has no objection in case FIR is quashed. Keeping in mind that a settlement has been arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2 before the Mediation Centre voluntarily and respondent no.2 has no objection in quashing of the FIR, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 03, 2017 ga

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4468/2017 DINESH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Kavita Agrawal and Mr. Vishwanath Kumar, Advs. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS..... Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Dharmendra Pratap Singh, P.S. Samaipur Badli. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.