- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 3 November 2017
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 4469/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak
Judgment
O R D E R %
03.11.2017 Respondent no.2-Rashmi Aggarwal is present in Court along with her counsel and has been identified by SI Virender Kumar of police station K.N. Katju Marg. She submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioner no.1 and his family members, that is, petitioner nos. 2 to 4 before the Family Court, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 17th August, 2015 vide Annexure P-2. She further submits that she is not willing to pursue the FIR any further and the same may be quashed. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 undertakes to remain bound by the terms of the settlement. Keeping in mind that petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes amicably vide Annexure P-2, in the interest of justice, FIR No.580/14 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at police station K.N. Katju Marg and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 03, 2017 ga
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4469/2017 MANU AGGARWAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Adv. with petitioner no.1 in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Virender Kumar, P.S. K.N. Katju Marg. Mr. Ashok Jain and Mr. Vishal, Advs. for R-2 along with R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.