Md. Akhtar v. Jamia Hamdard University and Anr

O R D E R %

03.11.2017

CM No.39508/2017

Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.9705/2017

¶1Against penalty of compulsory retirement, petitioner had preferred an appeal (Annexure P-12) which according to petitioner is still pending. Upon notice, learned counsel for respondents submits that if petitioner's appeal (Annexure P-12) has not been decided till date, the same would be definitely decided within a period of 8 weeks.

¶2In view of the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to convey the fate of the appeal (Annexure P-12) to petitioner if it is already decided and if not decided, then to do so within a period of 8 weeks by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of W.P.(C) 9705/2017 Page 2

hearing to the petitioner in the appeal. Needless to say, the fate of the appeal shall be made known to the petitioner within a week after the appeal is decided, so that petitioner may avail of the remedy as available in law

¶3With the aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of.

(SUNIL GAUR)

JUDGE NOVEMBER 03, 2017 mamta

W.P.(C) 9705/2017 Page 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9705/2017 MD. AKHTAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhishek Chaudhary, Advocate and Mr.Rishi Jain, Advocate versus JAMIA HAMDARD UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Saket Sikri, Advocate and Ms.Adwaita Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR