- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 October 2016
- Bench
- Vipin Sanghi
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 4033/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Vipin Sanghi
Judgment
O R D E R %
27.10.2016
Crl. M.A. No.16866/2016
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4033/2016 The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing of FIR No.1058/2015 registered on the complaint of the complainant under Sections 354A/ 506/ 509 IPC against the petitioner at Police Station – Mehrauli.
Issue notice. Mr. Katyal accepts notice on behalf of the State. Respondent No.2/ complainant is also present in Court and she accepts notice. She is represented through counsel, who has filed his Vakalatnama. He identifies respondent No.2. The parties have arrived at a settlement on 03.10.2016, which has been placed on record. The complainant states that she has not been subjected to any pressure or coercion and that she has entered the settlement out of her own free will. The complainant further states that she joins the prayer for quashing of the FIR in question. Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding further with the FIR in question and the proceedings emanating therefrom. The same are hereby quashed. Dasti.
VIPIN SANGHI, J OCTOBER 27, 2016 B.S. Rohella
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4033/2016 KULDEEP SINGH CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Yadav & Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP and Ms.Ankita Goyal, Advocate along with SI Vinod Kumar, PS-Mehrauli, for the State. Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for and along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.