- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 2 November 2016
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10200/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Indermeet Kaur
Judgment
O R D E R %
02.11.2016
Petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent. His submission is that his application which is lying pending since 15.9.2015 before the SDM for recalling of order dated
13.3.1990 has not been up for hearing. The submission in the aforenoted application is that he learnt about the order dated
13.3.1990 only on 03.8.2015. This was an ex parte order.
On advance notice, learned counsel for respondent has put in appearance. He has no instruction in the matter. The application pending before the SDM shall be decided expeditiously by the respondent.
Petition disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
NOVEMBER 02, 2016 ndn
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10200/2016 MOHAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.B.S.Maan and Mr.Vishan Maan, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Varun Nischal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.