VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Sadhna Aushadhalaya & Anr v. Sangeeta Kedia

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
26 October 2016
Bench
Valmiki J. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
RSA 324/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Valmiki J. Mehta

Judgment

O R D E R %

26.10.2016

¶1Counsel for the appellants after arguments, on instructions, states that the appeal is not pressed but the appellant be given time to vacate the suit premises on or before 30th June, 2017. Appellants will also pay the charges for use and occupation as per the decrees passed by the courts below with arrears being cleared within four weeks from today and, thereafter, to continue to pay every month, month by month, the use and occupation charges till the appellants continuing in possession of the suit premises. Appellants will also clear all charges towards electricity connection and water connection with respect to the suit premises till the appellants occupy the same.

¶2Let the appellants file affidavit of undertaking in terms of the present order within two weeks from today and on the appellants RSA 324/2016 filing the undertaking and complying with the terms of the same, the appellants will not be evicted from the suit premises till 30.6.2017.

¶3Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J OCTOBER 26, 2016 AK RSA 324/2016

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 324/2016 SADHNA AUSHADHALAYA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. R. Dey and Mr. Dikshant Khanna, Advocates. versus SANGEETA KEDIA ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.