VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Kartar Singh v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
26 October 2016
Bench
A.K. Pathakauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 3113/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak

Judgment

O R D E R %

26.10.2016 Crl. M.A. No. 16770/2016 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 3113/2016 Present FIR No. 487/2014 under Sections 420/34 IPC was registered at Police Station Jaitpur on the complaint of respondent no. 2 against the petitioner. FIR is outcome of a property deal between the petitioner and respondent no. 2. Petitioner and respondent no. 2 have settled their disputes amicably. Respondent no. 2 is present in Court and submits that he has compromised the matter with petitioner on his own free will and without any undue force and coercion or pressure. He further submits that he has received entire settled amount and is not willing to pursue the FIR any further. Keeping in mind the facts of this case, nature of offence, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 487/2014 under Sections 420/34 IPC registered at Police Station Jaitpur and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J. OCTOBER 26, 2016 rb

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3113/2016 KARTAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. Ajay Bidhuri, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through :Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC with SI Vishnu Dutt, P.S. Jaitpur for respondent no. 1 Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, respondent no. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.