- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 October 2016
- Bench
- Sanjeev Sachdeva
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10198/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sanjeev Sachdeva
Judgment
O R D E R %
27.10.2016 W.P.(C) 10198/2016 & CM No.40315/2016(interim direction) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had sought a decision on the application for renewal by the petitioner. He submits that the application of the petitioner has been refused and the present petition has become infructuous. The petitioner has already filed a petition, i.e. W.P.(C) No.10199/2016 impugning the decision of the respondent in refusing the grant of renewal. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in W.P.(C) No.10199/2016. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J OCTOBER 27, 2016 'sn'
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10198/2016 INDIAN SOCIAL ACTION FORUM (INSAF) ..... Petitioner Through : Mr Kabir Dixit and Mr Waheb Hussaini, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Mr Anil Soni, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.