- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 October 2016
- Bench
- Vipin Sanghi
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 3038/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Vipin Sanghi
Judgment
O R D E R %
30.03.2017
Crl. M.A. Nos. 1661-1662/2017
The petitioner had preferred this petition to seek parole for a period of eight weeks for getting medical treatment/ operation of his ailing mother.
Mr. Mehra has tendered in Court the latest nominal roll, which shows that the petitioner was released on furlough after filing of the present application between 06.02.2017 and 20.02.2017, and he has also been granted parole between 03.03.2017 and 03.04.2017.
In view of the aforesaid, the applications are disposed of as infructuous.
VIPIN SANGHI, J MARCH 30, 2017 B.S. Rohella
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3038/2016 MD SHAHNAWAZ ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma & Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel and Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.