- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 2 November 2017
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2356/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak
Judgment
O R D E R %
02.11.2017 Respondent no.2-Neetu is present in Court along with her counsel. She has been identified by SI Jaiveer Singh of police station K.M. Pur. She submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioner before the Mediation Centre, Saket Court on 6th August, 2016 of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. She submits that she and petitioner were living in the same colony. She submits that she is not willing to pursue the FIR any further and the same may be quashed. Keeping in mind that a settlement has been arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 528/2014 under Sections 354/509 IPC registered at police station K.M. Pur and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 02, 2017 ga
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2356/2017 MUKESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D.K. Mishra, Adv. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, APP for State with SI Jaivir Singh, P.S. K.M. Pur. Mr. Pradeep Nagar and Mr. Ajay Kumar Mishra, Advs. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.