- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 October 2016
- Bench
- Manmohan
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 8320/2014
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manmohan
Judgment
O R D E R %
25.10.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in accordance with the order dated 28th July, 2016, the petitioners have voluntarily removed the unauthorized construction as pointed out in the status report dated 28th October, 2015.
Learned counsel for the respondent-SDMC states that after verifying the facts, the Corporation shall taken suitable action in accordance with law within a period of two weeks. She also assures this Court that in the event, the unauthorized construction has been removed, directions shall be issued for restoration of the petitioners' electricity and water connections.
In view of the aforesaid statement, learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to press the present writ petition and pending application. Consequently, the same are disposed of.
Order dasti.
MANMOHAN, J OCTOBER 25, 2016 NG
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8320/2014 & CM Appl. 19281/2014 R.K. GANDHI & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya with Mr. Raj Karan Sharma, Advs. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Mohita, Adv. for Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Adv. for SDMC Mr. Pratap Shanker with Ms. A. Shivani, Adv. for DJB Mr. Deepak Pathak, Adv. for BSES RPL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.