- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- S. Ravindra Bhat, Deepa Sharma
- Case no.
- ITA 655/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Ravindra BhatFollow Deepa Sharma
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016
The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is highly belated - by 945 days in refiling. There is hardly any explanation for the delay. The appeal was filed on 20.12.2013 but appears to have been kept objected to. The Income Tax Department does not seem to have any clue about the filing of the appeal or the objections raised by the registry. It refers to the re-organisation of its penal and cites the pendency of large number of appeals marked defective. The reasons can hardly be considered sufficient cause to condone the delay.
The application and the appeal are accordingly dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J OCTOBER 26, 2016/vikas/
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 655/2016, CM APPL.31165-31166/2016 ITA 656/2016, CM APPL.31167-31168/2016 ITA 657/2016, CM APPL.31171-31172/2016 ITA 658/2016, CM APPL.31173-31174/2016 ITA 659/2016, CM APPL.31179-31180/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)-II ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pranjal Srivastava, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.