VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Surender Kumar v. Vijay Kumar Sharma

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 October 2016
Bench
A.K. Pathakauthor
Case no.
CRL.REV.P. 719/2014

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak

Judgment

O R D E R %

25.10.2016 During the course of hearing, petitioner and respondent have settled their disputes amicably. Petitioner has offered to pay `2,50,000/- to the respondent towards full and final settlement of all his claims involved in the cheque in question. Respondent, who is present in Court, accepts this offer. He submits that he has no objection in case offence is compounded. Accordingly, offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is permitted to be compounded and petitioner is acquitted. Out of the amount lying deposited in this Court, `2,50,000/- be released by the Registry to the respondent forthwith and the balance amount including the interest, if any, be released to the petitioner. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Copy of this order be given dasti to both the parties.

A.K. PATHAK, J. OCTOBER 25, 2016 rb

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 719/2014 & CRL.M.A. 18363/2014 SURENDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. Raghunandan Sharma, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent Through :Mr. A.K. Pandey, Adv. with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.