VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Raj Bala v. Vasan Healthcare Private Limited, & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
26 October 2016
Bench
S. Muralidharauthor
Case no.
ARB.P. 489/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar

Judgment

O R D E R %

26.10.2016

¶1The affidavits of service have been filed enclosing a tracking report of the postal authority which shows that the Respondents have been served.

¶2None appears for the Respondents.

¶3They are, accordingly, set ex parte.

¶4The Court, accordingly, proposes that Mr. Justice Kailash Gambhir, a former Judge of this Court (Mobile No. 9871300033) be appointed as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties including their claims and counter-claims. In the first instance, the proposed Arbitrator will make a disclosure to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre ("DAC") in

Arb. P. 489/2016

terms of Section 11 (8) read with Section 12 (1) of the Act and, thereafter, enter upon reference. DAC will provide to the parties copies of the said disclosure. In the event the disclosure is not made within a reasonable time or such disclosure discloses the inability of the proposed Arbitrator to act as such, it will be open to the parties to apply to this Court for directions.

¶5Subject to compliance with the above direction, Justice Gambhir will act as Arbitrator and enter upon reference. The learned Arbitrator is requested to fix his own terms and fees.

¶6The petition and the applications are disposed of. A copy of this order be communicated to Justice Gambhir as well as Additional Coordinator, DAC forthwith.

S. MURALIDHAR, J OCTOBER 26, 2016 dn

Arb. P. 489/2016

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 27. + ARB.P. 489/2016 RAJ BALA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Mr. Kunal Sachdeva and Ms. Damini Chawla, Advocates. versus VASAN HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.