VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Paramjit Singh v. Neelam Bhushan & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
27 October 2016
Bench
Sunil Gaurauthor
Case no.
FAO 431/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sunil Gaur

Judgment

O R D E R %

27.10.2016 C.M.No.32439/2016 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO 431/2016 & C.M.No.32438/2016 On the last date, some proxy counsel had appeared and had chosen to argue for some time and when he could not satisfy this Court as to why this appeal should be entertained, he had sought adjournment on the ground that the main counsel is not available. In the interest of justice, adverse orders were deferred and this appeal was adjourned for today. None appears today on behalf of appellant even on the second call. In such a situation, it is deemed appropriate to dismiss this appeal as well as the application in default. This appeal and the application are accordingly dismissed in default. SUNIL GAUR, J OCTOBER 27, 2016 s

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 431/2016 PARAMJIT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Nemo versus NEELAM BHUSHAN & ANR .....Respondents Through: Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.