UOI v. Bhagwana & Anr

O R D E R %

25.10.2016 C.M. No.37836/2016 (for release of surety bond by respondent No.1)

¶1Since the land acquisition appeal has been decided in favour of the respondent no.1 inasmuch as the enhanced compensation is granted, whatever has been granted by the land acquisition court below was also available to the respondent no.1 towards compensation of acquired land.

¶2Vide order dated 8.3.2010, the amount deposited in this Court by the appellant was directed to be released to the respondent no.1 on furnishing surety to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of this Court and respondent no.1 filed the surety bond which was accepted by this Court vide order dated 16.3.2010.

¶3In view of the above, the surety bond given by the respondent no.1 would stand discharged as the land acquisition appeal has been allowed by enhancing compensation granted by the land acquisition court and therefore the amount granted by the land acquisition court would, in any case, be the decretal amount in favour of the respondent no.1. C.M. stands disposed of. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J OCTOBER 25, 2016 Ne

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.APP. 196/2009 UOI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocate. versus BHAGWANA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rohtas, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen, Advocate with Ms. Kritika Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA