Sunita Chaudhary v. State

ORDER %

01.11.2011

¶1After brief submissions, with regard to the grant of bail to the Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file fresh applications before the learned Magistrate, if there is any change in circumstances. Permission is granted.

¶2The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. NOVEMBER 01, 2011 RN V.K. SHALI,J

-r^ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 446/2010 SUNITA CHAUDHARY Petitioner Through Mr.Shivendra Dwivedi and |V|r.Rajesh |V|ahale, Advs. versus STATE Respondent Through l^ir.Navin Sharma, APP (15) BAIL APPLN. 1882/2010 SUNITA CHAUDHARY Petitioner Through l^lr.Shivendra Dwivedi and i^lr.Rajesh Mahale, Advs. versus STATE Respondent Through Mr.NavIn Sharma, APP (16) BAIL APPLN. 1879/2010 JEETENDRA CHAUDHARY Petitioner Through Mr.Shivendra Dwivedi and Mr.Rajesh Mahale, Advs. versus STATE Respondent Through Mr.Navin Sharma, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.K. SHALI