- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- S. Muralidhar
- Case no.
- O.M.P. 924/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016
¶1It is pointed out that the subject matter of the petition is located in the jurisdiction of the State of Assam and an order has already been passed by the High Court of Gauhati on an application filed by the Respondents under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, which has been continued by the District Judge at Dhemaji, Assam and which interim order continues.
¶2In that view of the matter, the question of passing any interim order by this Court in relation to the same subject matter does not arise.
¶3The petition is dismissed. O.M.P. 924/2011
IA Nos.396/2012 & 13347/2016
¶4In view of the dismissal of the petition, the applications do not survive for consideration and are, accordingly, dismissed.
OCTOBER 26, 2016
S. MURALIDHAR, J. b'nesh
O.M.P. 924/2011
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 924/2011 M/S ROTEC INDUSTRIES INC ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Abhinandana Kain, Advocate. versus M/S SOMA ENTERPRISES & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Mr. Vaibhav Tomar, Mr. Karma Dorjee, Mr. Gianilung Panmei & Ms. Barnali Chowdhury, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Tarkeshwar Nata, Mr. Onkar Nath & Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.