VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Shree Balaji Traders v. Ltc Commercial Company Private Limited

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
27 October 2016
Bench
S. Muralidharauthor
Case no.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 309/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar

Judgment

O R D E R %

07.11.2016

IA No. 13755/2016 (for exemption)

¶1Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

I.A. 13754/2016

¶2Notice. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the non-Applicant/Respondent.

¶3Learned counsel for the parties have been heard.

¶4Learned counsel for the Petitioner/Applicant states that although the order dated 27th October 2016 begins with the words 'it is being agreed between the parties", the Petitioner did not in fact consent to all of the directions that followed the said words.

¶5The Court clarifies that even if the Petitioner wishes to withdraw its consent now, the directions issued by the Court by the order dated 27th October 2016 remain as such. The Court is not inclined to vary or modify any of the said directions issued by it.

¶6The application is disposed of. Order be given dasti.

S.MURALIDHAR, J NOVEMBER 07, 2016 Rm

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 309/2016 SHREE BALAJI TRADERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Advocate for Applicant in IA No. 13754, 13755/2016. versus LTC COMMERCIAL COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula with Mr. Sunil Dalal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.