VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Kanchan Kanan v. Rajiv Ranjan Roy

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
31 October 2011
Bench
Indermeet Kaurauthor
Case no.
TR.P.(C.) 72/2010

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Indermeet Kaur

Judgment

ORDER %

31.10.2011 By way of this petition, the present petitioner/wife is seeking transfer of the divorce petition which has been filed by her husband (Rajiv Ranjan Roy) under Section 13(1) (a) (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act pending before the Family Court Rohini to the Family Court Saket where a petition seeking maintenance eunder Section 125 Cr. P.C. filed by the wife is pending. Both the disputes have emanated from the factum of the marriage of Rajiv Ranjan Roy with Kanchan. The parties have one child. In the present petition, it is stated, that it is difficult for the petitioner-wife to compute with her child from one court to another court and for expeditious disposal and in the interest of justice, that both the petitions be tried by the same court. Transfer petition is opposed by the respondent. The submission of the petitioner has force; this is in fact the purpose and purport of enactment of the Family Court Act. The divorce petition which has been filed later in time i.e. HMA No. 335/2010 under Section 13(1) (a) (b) HMA pending before the Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Rohini Court is transferred to the Family Court at Saket where the divorce petition filed by the wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is pending. The parties to appear before the learned District Judge Rohini on 07.11.2011 who will ensure that the file of HMA No. 335/2010 is transferred to Family Court at Saket. The parties shall appear before the Family Court at Saket on the date already fixed i.e. 26.11.2011. With these directions, petition is disposed of OCTOBER 31, 2011 rb INDERMEET KAUR, J

Case details

Parties and counsel

\ $-14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR.P.(C.) 72/2010 KANCHAN KANAN Petitioner Through: Mr. Dilip Singh and Mr. Surjeet Singh, Advocates. versus RAJIV RANJAN ROY Respondent Through: Mr. Chetan Chawla, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.