S P Sakuja v. Commissioner of Police and Anr

ORDER %

15.10.2009 Learned counsel for the respondents has produced original file before the Court. The photographs show that the shop is provided with a rollingshutters and it is wrongly recorded in the impugnedorder that the doors have not been provided with a rollingshutter. It is further stated by the counsel for the petitioner that the other statements made in the impugned order passed by the Joint Commissionerare incorrect and the Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. J > ^ wiringis completelyconcealed. In view of the factthatthe impugnedorder incorrectly records that the rolling shutter was not provided^ it will be appropriateif the respondentscarry out fresh inspectiontoday itself. In case concealedelectricalwiring has been provided and the petitioner has compliedwith statutoryprovisions,temporarylicensewill be issued in the evening or by tomorrow morning. ^ With the aforesaid observations, writ petition is disposed of. Dasti to counsel for the parties under the signature of Court Master. OCTOBER 15,2009 Ag SANJIV KHANNA,J

* 100 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)12490/2009 S P SAKUJA Petitioner Through; IVIr. IVIunendra Kr. Singh and IVIr. A.K. Singh,Advocates for the petitioner. versus COMIVIISSIONEROF POLICEAND ANR Respondent Through: Mr. N. Waziri, StandingCounsel with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA