- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- S. Muralidhar
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 286/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016
¶1This petition has been pending since July, 2016 and no interim orders have been passed.
¶2The parties are stated to be negotiating a settlement. The Petitioner has to take steps to have an Arbitrator appointed by invoking the arbitration clause by sending a notice to the Respondent and, thereafter, seek appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law.
¶3If and when an Arbitral Tribunal is appointed, it will be open for the Petitioner to seek interim relief before the Arbitral Tribunal in accordance with law.
¶4The petition is disposed of.
OCTOBER 26, 2016
S. MURALIDHAR, J. b'nesh
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 286/2016 RELIANCE INFRATEL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Advocate. versus VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yashvardhan, Mr. Devinder Singh, Mr. Kunal Godhwani & Mr. Himanshu Kulshreshtha, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.