Rajiv Mittal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr

ORDER

03.11.2011 Crl. M.A. No. 12888/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.A. No. 1.2889/201.1" (stav) This is an application for ad-interim direction and interirn relief. I find no reason to issue directions for registration of the FIR in the present petition as an ad-interirn measure. Application is dismissed. W.P. (Crl.) 1502/2011 The main grievance of the learned counsel for the Petitioner is that the Petitioner had fited a petition before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate w.P.(cRL) 1s02/2011 Page I of 2 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. v :- along with an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. Despite IYz yeats having been passed by, the police has not filed the status reporl with the result the application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. has not been decided by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. Issue notice. Learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. I and2. Learned Additional Standing Counsel on instructions from SI P.N. Verrna, PS Neb Sarai, Delhi states that the matter is listed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate on 8tl' Novembet, 20II on which date a status report will be filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. In view of the statement of the learned Additional Standing Counsel, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. Petition is disposed of. Wq'Ya- - MUKTA GUPTAO J' NOVEMBER 03,2011 tvnt w.P.(cRL) 1s02/2011

I ,J 70# $.= * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELIII + w.P.(cRL) rs02l20lr RAJIV MITTAL Through: Ms. June Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anil Karnkial, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Additional Standing Counsel with SI P.N. Verma, PS Neb Sarai, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA .oh