- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2010
- Bench
- S. Muralidhar
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 7178/2010
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar
Judgment
ORDER %
26.10.2010 L Notice.Ml-. N. Waziri,learnedcounselacceptsnoticeon behalf of Respondents.
¶2It appears to this Court that the only reason why the licences have not been grantedto the Petitionersis that they do not have no objectioncertificate('NOC') from the Fire Department.The Fire Departmentdid in fact inspect each^ Petitioners' shops and had listed out certain defects. It is not clear whether the inspection report of the Fire Department was communicated to each of the Petitioners.
¶3For avoidingany further delay,this Courtdirectsthat within next two days each of the Petitioners will attend the office of the Station House Officer ('SHO'), Police StationLajpat Nagar, New Delhi and get a copy of the inspectionreport of the Fire Department in each of the Petitioners' cases. It will be open to the Petitioners to rectify the defects within next one day thereafter and report back to the SHO about having rectified the defects. The Fire Department will thereafter undertake another inspection of the Petitioners' shop and deliver an NOC or otherwise to the SHO within one day thereafter.
¶4If the Petitioners are still aggrieved by the decision of the Fire Department not granting licence for any reason, it will be open to them to seek appropriate remedies, including appearing before the Joint Commissioner, Delhi Police, that may be available to them in law.
¶5The petitions are disposed of in the above terms.
¶6Order be given dasti under the signature of the Court Master. S.MURALIDHAR, J OCTOBER 26, 2010 rk
Case details
Parties and counsel
'5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7171/2010 ANIL KUMAR Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS . Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate With + W.P.(C) 7175/2010 BAL KISHAN SHARMA Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate With + W.P.(C) 7176/2010 JAYANTI PRASAD Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate With + W.P.(C) 7177/2010 VIJAY KUMAR Petitioner Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate With + W.P.(C) 7178/2010 JAI PAL Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate And + W.P.(C) 7179/2010 MANOHAR LAL AHUJA Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.