- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 3 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1501/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta
Judgment
ORDER
03.11.2011 By this petition the Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 290120II under Sections 2881304A IPC registered at PS Punjabi Bagh, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No. 3. The allegations as set out in the FIR are that two sons of the Cornplainant/Respondent No. 3, that is, Manoj aged about six years and Manish aged about three years were playing near the basement which was dug out and large quantity of mud had collected, and due to weight the wall gave fell on the two children resulting in their death. w.P.(cRL) 1s0I/2011 Page I of 3 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. . The Complainantfi.espondent No.3 Mr. I{aran Sharrna @ Bal Bahadur, father of the deceased children is present in person and is identified by his counsel and the Investigating Officer. He states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.3/Complainant have ssttled the matter and he has been adequately compensated. The Petitioners have agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 15 lakhs as compensation to the Respondent No. 3 out of which {10 lakhs have already been paid to him and {5 lakhs have been paid to him vide Demand Draft No. 388815 dated 22"d October,2011 drawn on Corporation Bank, Sikanderpur. Respondent No. 3/Complainant further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, he does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful pulpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, and as there is no legal impediment in quashing the abovementioned FIR, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 29012011 under Sections 2881304A IPC registered at PS Punjabi Bagh, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are W.P.(CRL) 1s01/2011 I hereby quashed. Pafties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. Ihe petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti. w@_ ' MUKTA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER 03.2OI.I tvnt - ah{ r( 2l>([ a (, f ,\-J.b $L e, (16{^}/c"-'t'I"'^+ e nuq'4 ) w.P.(cRL) 1s01/2011 ,-4\ ,-.2 4{L_*p r"\s;.T{{,^
Case details
Parties and counsel
69#$- * IN THE I{IGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 150112011 & Crl. M.A. No. 1288712011 (Stav) SANJAY CHAUDRY & ORS ...'. Petitioners Through: Mr. Anuj Soni, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE & ORS ""' ResPondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel for the State with SI Manohar Lal, PS Punjabi Bagh. Mr. S.S. Chugh, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 with ResPondent coRAM, *o' 3 in Person' IION'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.