VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

M/S Ascend Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd v. Videocon Telecommunications Limited

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
26 October 2016
Bench
S. Muralidharauthor
Case no.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 238/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar

Judgment

O R D E R %

26.10.2016

¶1No interim orders have been passed in this petition since May, 2016. Learned counsel for the Respondent is not agreeable to the appointment of an Arbitrator because according to them there are no arbitrable disputes between the parties.

¶2The Petitioner shall take steps to have an Arbitrator appointed by invoking the arbitration clause by sending a notice to the Respondent and thereafter seek appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law.

¶3If an when an Arbitral Tribunal is appointed, it will be open for the Petitioner to seek interim reliefs before the Arbitral Tribunal in accordance with law.

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)238/2016

¶4The petition is disposed of.

OCTOBER 26, 2016

S. MURALIDHAR, J. b'nesh

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)238/2016

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 238/2016 ASCEND TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal & Mr. Kanishk Ahuja, Advocates. versus VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Soumik Ghosal, Mr. Devinder Singh & Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.