- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- S. Muralidhar
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 238/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016
¶1No interim orders have been passed in this petition since May, 2016. Learned counsel for the Respondent is not agreeable to the appointment of an Arbitrator because according to them there are no arbitrable disputes between the parties.
¶2The Petitioner shall take steps to have an Arbitrator appointed by invoking the arbitration clause by sending a notice to the Respondent and thereafter seek appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law.
¶3If an when an Arbitral Tribunal is appointed, it will be open for the Petitioner to seek interim reliefs before the Arbitral Tribunal in accordance with law.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)238/2016
¶4The petition is disposed of.
OCTOBER 26, 2016
S. MURALIDHAR, J. b'nesh
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)238/2016
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 238/2016 ASCEND TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal & Mr. Kanishk Ahuja, Advocates. versus VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Soumik Ghosal, Mr. Devinder Singh & Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.