VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2009 › High Court of Delhi

Rakesh Kumar Singhal and Ors v. Dcp(Licensing) and Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
9 October 2009
Bench
San3Iv Khannaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 12245/2009

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow San3Iv Khanna

Judgment

ORDER o/o

09.10.2009 It is the contention of the petitioners that in the month of July, 2009 pursuant to an advertisement published by Delhi Policethey had appliedfor issuance of temporary licences for selling crackers on the festivals of Dussehraand Diwali from 26*^"^ September,2009 to 19^*^ October,2009 but the said applications have not been disposed of by the respondent No. 1 till today. It is the contention of the petitioners that Fire Department of the Government of NCT of Delhi has given them no objection certificates. Learned counsel, who appears for the respondents on advance notice, submitsthat speaking orders will be passed withina periodoftwo days from today. The statement made by the counselfor the respondentsis taken on record. The respondents will dispose of the applicationsfiled by the petitionersfor grant of temporarylicencesfor selling crackers within two Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. days by passing speal<ingorders in case they reject the applications filed by the petitioners. The writ petition and all pending applications are disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under signature of the Court Master.

SANJIV KHANNA, J. W OCTOBER09, 2009 vkrV V

Case details

Parties and counsel

V" 38. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12245/2009 & CM No. 12530/2009 RAKESH KUMAR SINGHAL AND ORS Petitioners Tlirough Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Advocate. versus DCP(LICENSING)AND ORS Respondents Tlirough Mr. Najmi Waziri & Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN3IV KHANNA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.