VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Gaurav Chopra v. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
4 November 2011
Bench
M.L. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3494/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow M.L. Mehta

Judgment

ORDER

04.11.2011 Crl. M.A. No.12971/2011 This application is filed for preponement. Heard and allowed. Crl. M.C. No.3494/2011 The matter is taken up today. I have heard the matter finally on merits. The petitioner has disputed the payment as raised by the respondent and also challenged the impugned order dated 30th July, 2011 whereby he was directed to pay 30% of the demanded amount while being granted bail by the learned ASJ. It would in the interest of justice and in the fitness of things if the impugned order is modified to r -" -" Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. the extent that the petitioner would deposit Rs.25,000/- against the impugned bill without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both the parties within two weeks from today. This is also without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both the parties on merits before the learned ASJ. The petition is disposed of. Dasti. -NOVEMBER 04,2011 skw M.L. MEHTA,J "1 / ;- ;-!

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3494/2011 GAURAV CHOPRA Through : versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD Through : CORAM: ..... Petitioner Mr. B.S. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr. Deepak Bashta with Mr. Sunil Kumar for Ms. Anjali Sharma, Advocates. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA %

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.