- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 21 October 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3533/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta
Judgment
ORDER %
21.10.2011 CrI. M.A. No. 12535/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. 3533/2011 This iis a petition for quashing of FIR No. 757/2006 under Sections ^ 498A/406/34IPG registeredatPS R.K. Puram,NewDelhi. The Complainant/RespondentNo. 2 Ms. Varsha @ Hina Kaushar is present in person and is identified by her counsel. The Complainant/ RespondentNo. 2 states that the disputesbetweenthe PetitionerNo. 1 and her have been amicably resolved and they are living together as husband and CRL.M.C. 3533/2011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. wife for the two and half years. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementionedFIRandthe proceedingspursuantthereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differencesoftheir own free will, volitionand withoutany coercionand no useful purposewill be servedin continuanceof the proceedings,ratherthe same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently,FIR No. 757/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34IPG registeredat PS R.K. Puram, New Delhi and proceedingspursuantthereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in aclaiowledgmentof their statements made before this Court. The petitionis disposedof. Orderdasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J. OCTOBER 21, 2011 'vn' CRL.M.C. 3533/2011 Page 2 of2 (\yy 9^ y -r
Case details
Parties and counsel
70#$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3533/2011 ZAKIR ALI & ANR. Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP with SI Pankaj Thalcran, PS R.K. Puram. Mr. Ayub IChan, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.