- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 28 October 2010
- Bench
- Reva Khetrapal
- Case no.
- MAC.APP. 702/2010
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Reva Khetrapal
Judgment
ORDER oh
28.10.2010 In view of the fact that the appellant did not seek permission under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for the purpose of assailing the quantum of compensation awarded to \') the claimants, the present appeal is not maintainable. The same is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable. Liberty is, however, given to the appellant, as prayed by the appellant, to seek any appropriate remedy, if available in law. ("** P-?_rJ REVA KHETRAPAL,J ocToBER 28, 2010 sk Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
z- I-27 * IN TIIE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP . 70212010 and CMs No. 18940 -1894112010 IFFCO TOKIO GEN INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Sunil Kumar Tiwari, Advocates. versus JLING BAHADUR. SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.