Roop Chand v. State

ORDER

03.11.2011 By this pctition, the Petitioner seeks parole for a pcriod of tcn days on the ground that the Petitioner's daughter has given birth to a child on 5tr' October, 20ll and the Petitioner wishes to spend tirne with thc ncw born child and also to participate in certain ceremonies. On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed by the State. As per the status report, the factum of birth of a child bcing born to the daughter of the Pctitioner has been verified. 'thc Pctitioncr has bcen convicted for offence punishable under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and awarded a sentence of imprisonrncnt for a period of six months. IIe has already undergone four rnonths imprisonment and nearly Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. llz months remains to be undergone. In view of the fact that the sentence of the Petitioner is corning to an end in another less than two months, I do not find it to be a fit case to grant parole to the Petitioner. The pctition is disrnissed. Copy of this order bc communicatcd to the Petitioner through Superintendent,'Iihar Jail. }WMLW "MUKTA GUI}TA,J NOVE,MBER 03,2O1I 'dk'

$- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NE,W DELHI + w.P.(cRr.) l4l5l20rr ROOP CI IAND Through VCTSUS ST'A]'I] Through Mr. A. J. Ilhambhani Bhambhani, Advocatc. Petitioner & Ms. Nisha ..... Itespondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State. o CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA