Pritam Vaid v. The State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi)

O R D E R %

26.10.2016

I have allowed the bail application preferred by the co-accused, who is the son of the petitioner in the present case. The son of the petitioner, who is married to the complainant, and on account of the matrimonial disputes between them, the FIR No.325/2016 under Section 406/498A/34 IPC and section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act at PS Prashant Vihar came to be registered.

The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner's son has been allowed by a separate order. For the reasons stated therein, the present application is also allowed on the same terms and conditions.

VIPIN SANGHI, J OCTOBER 26, 2016 sr

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1068/2016 PRITAM VAID ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Panwar and Mani Chaudhary, Advocates versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP with Ms. Ankita Goyal, Adv. Mr. Priyank Kher for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI