Jamaludin v. State

ORDER

02.11.2011 this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has operation of eyes of his wife conducted and to arrange funds for By to get the the same. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner was asked to find out the date of surgery of the Petitioner's wife. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that no date for surgery has been fixed. As per the status report, verification was conducted and it was found that the Petitioner's wife Smt. Shahjanah is under treatment of Dr. K. P. Singh, Sultanpur. According to the status report, doctors have not advised for surgery. Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. In view of the verification report and as the Petitioner has not been able to tell what surgery has to be performed and date of the surgery, I find no reason to entertain the present petition for parole. Petition is dismissed. Copy of this order be communicated to the Petitioner through Superintendent, Tihar Jail. v^,^*t-4-Q& t'"--'-' / f - I MUKTA GUPTA.J NOVEMBER O2.2OII 'dkt

s- * IN THB HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI w.P.(cRL) r43v20rr JAMALUDIN Through VCTSUS STATE Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishnan, A.S.C. for State with SI Dinesh PS Hauz Khas. o CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA