Yusuf Ali v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

ORDER

21.1,0.2011 Learned proxy counsel for the State states that the reply affidavit has been filed, however, the same is not on record. A copy of the same has been furnished As per the reply affidavit the Petitioner has been granted parole by the Lieutenant Governor, which communication has been sent to the Superintendent Tihar Jail, vide letter dated 18'h October,2}II. In view of the fact that the Petitioner has already been granted parole by the competent authority, the present petition has become infi'uctuous. Petition is disrnissed as inftuctuous. l1r'"Xh M ' MUKTA GUPTA, J. ocToBER 21, 20ll tvnt Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

oh 46# $- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) r39sl20rr YLISUF ALI ..... Petitioner 'fhrough: iMr. Shailendra Babbar, Advocate' VETSUS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ""' Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil A. Menon, Advocate Mr' Dayan Krishnan, Additional Standing Counsel with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jagapuri, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA