VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Pawan v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 October 2011
Bench
Badar Durrez Ahmei), Veena Birbal
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 1330/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Badar Durrez Ahmei)Follow Veena Birbal

Judgment

ORDER "h

24.tti.201L Mr Pawan sharma appearing on behalf of the State submits that the report card in respect of Poonam @Faridawas sought to be verified from the concemed school, namely, Navjyoti Prirrrary Sclrool, Amar Colony, Near Jamuna Pusta, Delhi. However, the same could not be verified as the said school is no more and even the builcling has been demolished. Anyhow, Poonam @Faridahas positively asserted that she is definitely over 18 years of age and states that her younger sister is also in the range of 17-18 years who is a student of class XI' . we have heard the counsel for the parties and have also held a hearing in chambers. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parents of Poonam @ Farida states that her parents would have no diff,rculty and would go along with the decision taken by her. we have enquired from Poonam @Farida as to where she wants to reside and she has stated that she wants to reside with her husband' namely, Pawan (the petitioner herein). In view of the fact that the parents of Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ( poonam @ Farida have no objection to this as also the fact that she is apparently over 18 years of age and has entered into matrimony of her own free will' we direct that it would not be necessary for Poonam @ Farida to retum to Nirmal chayaand she can leave the court premises along with her husband' The station House Officer of Police Station Narela be directed to ensuie that no untoward incident takes place insofar as the petitioner and his wife and their families are concerned. This writ petition stands disposed of' Dasti under the signatures of the court master' VEENA BIRBAL' J ocToBER24,201l srb fifn-unnpZ .q.trvlnl' J

Case details

Parties and counsel

> $- 20 * IN THE HIGH COTJRT + W.P.(CRL) 1330/2011 OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PAWAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr M.K. Gahlaut, Advocate versus S'IATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ""' Respondent Through Mr Pawan Sharma, St' Counsel' ' Mr Munesh Chauhan' Advocate for R-4 to 8' CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMEI) HON'BLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.