- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 3 November 2011
- Bench
- Mt]Kta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1290/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mt]Kta Gupta
Judgment
ORDER
03.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 10812009, under Sections 406142011208 IPC .registered at P.S. Economic Offences Wing, District Crime & Railways. On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed. As per the status report and as stated by the learned Addl. Standing Counsel the interest of no other person except the Respondent No. 2 is involved. lvIr. Eiiaz Ahmad Bazaz,Executive Manager Law, J & K Bank Ltd./Respondent No' 2 who is present in Court is identified by the learned counsel . He states that the Respondent No. 2 has settled the matter with the Petitioners and in % Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. a. 4*: view of the settlement arrived at he is authorised to make a statement on behalf of the Bank that the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings arising therefrorn maY be quashed. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful putpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal irnpedirnent in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, 108/2009, under Sections 406142011208 IPC .registered at P.S. Economic Offences Wing, District Crime & Railways. and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed' Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgrnent of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. W@ 'MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 03,2011 H'tu'g 1 flraruo1l) , /-( ) QaI6o"r) (aYso: <) )-. ..1l ro: 6) o.' . v{ Cn} * ttla .a1 ?t/w["ft il,,b Y Wnn*, Xtp"f uti t)
Case details
Parties and counsel
$- * ir IN THE HIGH COI]RT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI w.P.(cRL) r290t20rr RAKESH VERMA & ORS. ""' Petitioner Through \4r. Manish Kaushik, Advocate for Petitioner No. 1 to 6 along with petitioners in Person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELH & ANR. ""' Respondent Through Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, A.S.C. for State with Insp. Vinod Gandhi, BOW. IW. Tanveer A. Mir, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MT]KTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.