VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Rakesh Singhla & Ors v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
1 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3177/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta

Judgment

ORDER o/o

01.11.2011 This is a petitionfor quashingof FIR No. 365/2008under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Aman Vihar, Delhi. The complainant/RespondentNo. 2 Ms. Reena is present in person and is identified by the InvestigatingOfficer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainanthave entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and RespondentNo. 2/complainant has been dissolvedby a decree of divorce by mutualconsenton 6^*^ July, 2011. As part offull and final settlementof all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid CRL.M.C. 3177/2011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ^3,50,000/- out of which ^3 lakhs have already been paid to her and ^50,000/- has been paid today in Court by way of demand draft No. 449689 drawn on Canara Bank. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purposewill be served in continuanceof the proceedings,ratherthe same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 365/2008 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Aman Vihar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. n Thepetitionandthe pendingapplicationare disposedof. Orderdasti. MUKTA GUPTA,J November oi, 2011 'ga' n CRLM.C.3177/2011 , page2 of2

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C.3177/2011& Crl.M.A: 1/2011 (stay)(tobe.numbered) RAKESH SINGHLA & ORS Petitioner Through Mr. Gulshan Kr. Sharma, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with SI Subh Ram PS Aman Vihar. R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.