VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2010 › High Court of Delhi

Hari Chand v. Govind Ram

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
27 October 2010
Bench
Veena Birbalauthor
Case no.
RC.REV. 218/2010

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Veena Birbal

Judgment

ORDER o/o

27.LO.2OLO Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is not pressing the present petition on merits and prays that petitioner may be given time till 01.08.2011 to vacate the premises in question. Learned counsel for the respondent respondent has no objection if petitioner is vacate the premises in question till 01.08.2011. respondent is also present in person. In view of above statement, the present as pending application stand disposed of. states that given time to The son of the { petition as well The petitioner is granted time till 01.08.2011 to vacate the premises in question, subject to filing of usual undertaking RC.REV.2L8I2OIO Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. by the petitioner within one week with a copy to the respondent. List on 22.II.2010. In the meanwhile, the respondent shall not execute the eviction order till the next date of hearing. ,4 Dasti V-*' \ r-' ' VEENA BIRBAL, J ocroBER 27,20LO srb -i7|r't^*tf Cat* M? rtlA 2 /.*4.v-r RC.REV,2L8I2OLO

Case details

Parties and counsel

37. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 2rgl20!0 & cM r646gl20to HARI CHAND ....' Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Singhal, Adv. with petitioner in Person. VCTSUS GOVIND RAM .... ResPondent Through: Mr. Babu Lal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.