Kishore Madhukar Paknikar v. Union of India & Ors

ORDER

01.11.2011 Respondents No.1 to 3 are duly served. However, service on standing counsel for Union of India is awaited. Though the present petition is registered as civil contempt, it is the submission of the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner be permitted to file a criminal contempt petition against the officers of respondents No.1 and 2, wherein all the necessary averments shall be set out. ,.... In view of the aforesaid submission made by counsel for the \, c' petitioner, the present contempt petition is permitted to be withdrawn while granting leave to the petitioner to file an appropriate petition as proposed by him. NOVEMBER 01, 2011 'anb' HIMA KOHLI,] - /R '/11/11. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. $tV 39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI , + KISHORE MADHUKAR PAKNIKAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Rudra Kahlon, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI I ORDER

06.03.2012 CM No.4259/2012 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM No.4258/2012 ..... Respondents This application is filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for clarification of order dated 1.11.2011 wherein, the contempt petition was permitted to be withdrawn at the request of the petitioner while granting him to file an appropriate criminal contempt petition against the officers of respondents No.1 and 2. Learned cownsel for the petitioner states that the need to file the I present application has arisen on account of the fact that the petitioner i requires clarification from the Court as to whether permission under Section 15 stands granted to the petitioner to proceed to file a criminal contempt petition without seeking the permission from the Standing Counsel (Civil), Govt. of NCT of Delhi. I It is clear that while passing order dated 1.11.2011, this Court had only granted leave to the petitioner to follow the process as (' prescribed in law to file a criminal contempt petition. The application is disposed of. MARCH 06, 20i2 Sv/sk HIMA KOHLI, J

\! '. ' $rv 12. * IN THE HtGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + KISHORE MADHUKAR PAKNIKAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rudra Kahlon, Adv. : versus UNION OF'INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Ravindu Agarwal, Adv. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Gaurav Tomar, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI