Suresh Gupta & Anr v. Gs Patnayak & Anr

ORDER o/o

21.10.2011

¶1The petitionershave filed the present petition praying inter alia for initiationof contemptof court proceedingsagainstthe respondents for non-compliance of the judgment dated 10.01.2011 passed in W.P.(C) 820/2008.

¶2Counsel for the respondents states that the respondents had preferred an intra court appeal against the aforesaid judgment, registered as LPA 799/2011, which has been dismissed recently vide order dated 29.09.2011. He, therefore,submitsthat the respondents have decided not to file any appeal against the aforesaid dismissal order and instead comply with the directions contained in the judgment dated 10.01.2011. CONT.CAS(C)530/2011 ^ ^

¶1Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

¶3In view of the aforesaidsubmissionmade by the counsel for the respondents,the present petition is disposed of with directionsto the respondentsto issue a fresh demand letter in lieu of the impugned letterdated 26.04.2006issued by the respondentsto the petitionerto pay cost as per the currentcost prevailingas on 01.01.1993. Needful shall be done within four weeks from today. The petitionershall pay the demanded amount in terms of the policy of the respondent/DDA within a period of two weeks thereafter. The conveyancedeed shall be executedwithin a further period of four weeks therefrom. The petition is disposed of. OCTOBER 21, 2011 rkb HIMA KOHLI,J CONT.CAS(C)530/2011 ^ ^

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 530/2011 SURESH GUPTA &ANR Petitioners Through: l^ir. S.C. Ladi, Sr. Advocatewith Ms. Deeksha Ladi Kakar, Advocate versus GS PATNAYAK&ANR Respondents Through: i^r. Ajay Verma, Advocate CORAI^: HON'BLE IviS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI