Rahul Mittal & Anr v. State & Ors

ORDER %

24.10.2011 Present none for the Petitioner. By this petition the Petitioners have sought protection as they are major and have married of their own free will contrary to the wishes of Respondent No.4 to 6. Neither are the Petitioners nor their counsel is present today, nor any steps have been taken for the service of Respondent Nos. 4 to 6. A status report has been filed by the State as per which both the Petitioners were contacted and the statements were recorded wherein they state that till date there was neither any harassment nor were they threatened W.P.(CRL) 946/2011 s Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. by anyone. However, the Division Officer and the beat staff have been briefed regarding the matter and have been directed to remain in touch with the Petitioners. In view of the status report and in view of the fact that none is present on behalf of the Petitioner and no steps have been taken for service of Respondent No. 4 to 6, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. MUKTA GUPTA,J OCTOBER 24,2011 'ga' W.P.(CRL) 946/2011 page 2 of2

$-36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 946/2011 RAHUL MITTAL & ANR Petitioner Through None versus STATE & ORS Respondent Through Mr. H.S. Nanda proxy for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State with lO Subey Deen PS Nihal Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA