Savitri Devi v. Mahavir Steel Rolling Mills & Anr

t #15,16&18 % 08.10.2009 Present:- Mr. Pravir K. Jain, Advocate for the Respondent. +CM(M) No.4B3/20O9. CM(M) No.49B/2OO9 & CM(M) No.549/2OO9. * The counsel for the respondent M/s Mahavir Steel Rolling Mills and Shri Dayal in each of these petitions had mentioned the matters in the morning. He had informed that owing to personal difficulty he would not be able to appear. He had also informed that all these three petitions have become infructuous as the suits from which these petitions had arisen have been decreed in the Trial courL. None has appeared for the petitioners in spite of passover. The petitions are dismissed in default. NoB2L5/20O9 (all u/S L5L CPC for stav). with the disposal of main petition, these applications have become infructuous and are disposed of. October OB , 2009 PP L Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.